Anti Word of the Week: Besties
Posted by Jack on 12.12.2008 at 12:53 pm
Because I’m a total curmudgeon, this will now be weekly feature in which I rail on modern language and the destruction thereof. In a recent blog post, our Queen of all things reading related, Dana Barrett, used the expressions “…your book club besties.” Now I am no old fuddy-duddy or anything of the sort (although I certainly fall in the Harold Bloom canonical works category than Oprah kitsch pick of the month category), but is this a commonly used term? You would think, considering that I am still ID’d at rated R films, forget about liquor stores, that I would be more in touch with such vernacular.
I sauntered over to the wasteland of casual verbiage that is Urban Dictionary to find this:
[I'm not even going to touch "totes," that curious mixture of hipster/Hilton speak that I can't get away from in SF]. Now mind you I understand the concept–contextually it’s fairly easy to glean–but does anyone else think “beasties” when they see that? Is this one of those things that just works better in voice than in writing?
6 Comments » | Tagged Uncategorized, Anti Word of the Week, besties, dana barrett
« Better World Book Club: Run by Anne Patchett // Top Ten Best Green Books »
- Aaron King africa ARC Author Interview betterworld.com better world books better world books fund Better World Books in the field blog book drive book drives book reviews books books for africa bookstore campus campus division in southeast asia conferences dana barrett david murphy green festival green for all hilarious posts Impact invisible children library literacy literacy statistics massachusetts Natasha National Center for Family Literacy NCFL off-topic Our Partners partner updates Pat Plonski Phi Theta Kappa podcast Poll Wednesday press room to read Show Us Some Love social entrepreneurship worldfund Xavier Helgesen
- Antiquarian Ramblings (8)
- Author Podcast (45)
- Better World Book Club (9)
- Book & Author News (23)
- Book Lists (17)
- Book Reviews (66)
- Books on the Big Screen (6)
- Company News (38)
- Contests (6)
- Dispatches from the Green House (45)
- Flabbergasted (13)
- Impact (118)
- Our Partners (154)
- Poll Wednesday (19)
- Show Us Some Love (28)
- The Man Behind the Curtain (22)
- Uncategorized (299)
- Week In Review (18)
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
-
Recently Reviewed Books 
Brunonia Barry
The Lace Reader
Tilar J. Mazzeo
The Widow Clicquot
Getting to Know Us
-
Latest Comments
In a plain, very old handbook for the Modern Woodmen a men's organization) I fou...
A little more than $1,500 cash. No joke. The book had been returned to the lib...
3. Susan Wright - July 26, 2010 I found several old four leaf clovers in a bo...
What an incredible story, Abbey! I've never found anything more interesting t...
That is so good. I once found $50 in a secondhand book...I shouldn't have bought...
Leave a Comment »
Trackback | RSS 2.0
Never heard of the term “besties”–but then English is forever changing. I am long past the days of being ID ed–(I’m sixty folks!)– I’ve just been listening to “House of the Seven Gables” by Nathaniel Hawthorn and it is a little uncanny to realize how many words have not changed!
I have for a long time, been interested in finding a term other than “best friend” for “best friend.” Introducing your best friend to other friends can be quite a put down to your other friends. So maybe saying “This is one of my besties” would be a better and easier, not to say non-insulting to explain your relationship of you with that person. ( Did you get all that?)
I’m sure that it is probably a chick thing.
I’m on board with you about needing a new word for that, Juicyfruits. Personally I’m not sure I could use the word effectively, which perhaps leads to my reluctance to embrace it. Jealousy of not being able to pull off the new lingo
That being said, I think you may be correct about it’s origins. I am, alas, not in the target demographic.
[...] -We found an awesome way to store your growing collection -Better World Book Club is here! -Jack bemoaned the vernacular, and the poll proved him wrong -We took a peek at the Top 10 Green [...]
Re: Harold Bloom canonical works vs. Oprah’s choices — Aw, come on. I don’t consider Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Elie Wiesel, William Faulkner, Tolstoy, Steinbeck, and Toni Morrison to be kitsch. I don’t think Oprah would ever tell you she’s a literary critic a la Bloom, but which of the two of them has truly encouraged more people to read challenging works?
Haha, Ok Laura, you got me there to an extent. My point was more which person with whom I was more likely to be in accordance.
Also, you are absolutely correct with the titles you have selected and their canonical status, but I would suggest that O’s picks have turned more in that direction of late. If you look at her body of picks, (http://www.cam-info.net/oprahc.html), I think we can agree there’s a good percentage of works that will hardly make it out of this decade, forget about this century.
Also, the term “challenging works” is a sticky one in that regard… but we can talk about that later
[...] was all a-twitter (not the social media site) about the Twilight Series. Being that I’m the grumpiest reader in all the land, I ignored it. She even told me of a manuscript that was leaked that she was excitedly reading as [...]